Emin article continues to cause trouble with Cameron Quinn, representitive for IKO Oyama, weighing into the debate questioning the head of AKKA in Australia’s email attack on Eddie Emin.
Emails correspondence below from John Taylor and Cameron Quinn regarding the Eddie Emin article in November Issue of Blitz.
from John Taylor < firstname.lastname@example.org >
date Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:58 AM
subject [Fwd: Re: Insult to Sosai Oyama]
Dear Shihan, Sensei & Sempai,
I would have thought the attack on Sosai’s good name and reputation would have at least united all in Kyokushin in the condemnation of Eddie Emin, I guess not and so I forward this email from Cameron Quinn who obviously feels the need to stand up for Eddie Emin.
I guess Cameron Quinn is entitled to his opinion as well
——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Re: Insult to Sosai Oyama
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:24:53 +1000
From: Cameron Quinn < email@example.com >
CC: Kuristina Oyama < firstname.lastname@example.org >
If you are so outraged why do you continue your own outrageous use of
your teacher for your own advantage, lying to the members of your
bogus organisation that you have a legal and ethical connection to
Sosai, using his family’s intellectual property which, as a Branch
Chief, you be protecting not exploiting irresponsibly and stealing
from Honbu by not paying fees.
When you and Mr Matsushima start acting more responsibly yourself
you’ll be in a position to pass judgement on Eddie. Otherwise your
reaction should be seen as nothing more than opportunism and spite.